The city must have unity, but must also break the
monotony, and differentiate those buildings that deserve to contribute to the
whole society. In a country where it has not been built a school of
architecture as such, where they also have a tactic on the direction of
architecture, seems to be the ideal excuse to make of this building something that
stands in the city.
This building should not limit the
spatial continuity of the city, should permit indoor-outdoor communication and
outdoor to outdoor, so that there isn’t an unbreakable wall, permeable in certain directions and embracing the spaces around them, taking
responsibility for its surroundings
The pedagogy associated with a school of
architecture is different from what we understand of it other schools.
It is a process always moving, dynamic and flexible, with a clear point of
departure, but with a diffuse finish, which cannot be controlled, and whose
freedom should not be limited.
The path is what remains and leaves an impression,
and therefore what is essential in learning. A way to suggest and take you to
the limit, serves both as selection of the strongest and makes you more
The architecture follows a path that is
broken, and ends in different places, which takes you to get out of the way
and come back, look back to see what has been achieved, and looking forward,
imagining what is left. It is a path of sensations and exploration, technical
and humanistic knowledge.